I Coded DodgysDD's 94% IFVG Strategy. Only 1 Rule Actually Helped.

📘 Free PDF: 10 NQ myths, tested on 5 years of data → https://testednq.com I Tested the 94% Win Rate IFVG Strategy DodgysDD's backtest video shows a 94% win rate: 16 wins and 1 loss, with six or seven break-even trades left out. I coded his mechanical ICT inverse fair value gap (IFVG) model (liquidity sweep, one obvious fair value gap, entry on the inversion close, premium and discount filter) and backtested it on 5 years of NQ futures with costs on every trade: every rule, four timeframes, and where a 94% win rate comes from. 0:00 The 94% win rate 0:51 His IFVG model, rule by rule 2:18 How I tested it 3:13 Results: 5 years, 4 timeframes 4:32 Where a 94% win rate comes from 5:34 Same code on fake prices 6:02 Anything worth keeping? 6:54 Verdict Not financial advice. Educational content only. Futures trading involves substantial risk of loss. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE (CFTC Rule 4.41): These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown. Costs: 1 tick of slippage each way + $4.50 commission per round trip. Sources (DodgysDD on YouTube): 94% Win Rate iFVG Backtesting Session (Best Futures Strategy) · Mechanical IFVG Trading Strategy That Makes Me Over $100K/Month · The Complete IFVG Masterclass Photo: "Lehman Brothers Headquarters on Bankruptcy Day" by Robert Scoble, CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), cropped.